According to this ACLJ article A Christian pastor by the name of Youcef Nadarkhani may be executed Wednesday or shortly there after. His crime? He confesses Christ Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.
"When asked to 'repent' by the Judges, Youcef stated, 'Repent means to return. What should I return to? To the blasphemy that I had before my faith in Christ?' The judges replied, 'To the religion of your ancestors, Islam.' To which he replied, 'I cannot.'" (ibid.)
Pr. Nadarkhani will be given two additional chances to renounce his faith in Christ and confess Mohammed is the true prophet of God. If he doesn't, he will likely be executed immediately as an apostate according to the government of Iran.
As an American citizen the idea that I could be executed for the confession of my faith by the state is utterly foreign to me. I really can't grasp what it means to live under the fear of a theocratic government having the power to force me to choose between my faith or death. It's simply "unAmerican" for government to infringe upon another's right to practice their own religion.
At times I have heard some American Christians wistfully talk about martyrdom and put down Christians in the USA and Europe as "Laodiceans" who are weak in faith. It is true that the Churches throughout Europe and America do at times look lukewarm, or indifferent, in their confession of Christ. It is surely a fact that some denominations have fallen into outright apostasy. However, I believe it is a mistake to try to compare Christians living in western democracies with those who live under the boot of theocratic oppression such as that found in Iran. It is an apple versus oranges comparison. Sadly, with much liberty comes ample opportunity to walk away from our faith.
American Christians are attacked on all sides by an insidious persecutor. We are beset upon by a moralistic, deistic, therapeutic ethos which also happens to forcefully propound "religious tolerance" in an effort to silence Christians (or anyone else with an exclusive truth claim for that matter) who would dare confess the truth of Jesus Christ. Make no mistake about it, we Christians in the western world are heavily under attack. The truth is under attack. We just don't have the executioner's axe physically held over our heads.
One of the attacks we face in American Christianity is the strong temptation for syncretism and unionism. We are barraged with a "live and let live" message through various sources such as the media and entertainment industry. The multicultural message is all around us, indoctrinating us with the universalist message of religious coexistence, which really means that there is no room for anyone's identification with an exclusive truth claim (such as Christ's "I am the way, the truth, and the life" John 14:6) aside from the claim that all religions are basically the same. There just is "religion," which has become a generic brand of therapy. You have your "god" which makes you feel good and helps you to live a moral life, and I have my "god" which does the same, or so the spirit of the age tells us.
Religious leaders caught up in this universal spirit of the age fall all over themselves in taking opportunity to show their unity in the doctrine of religious multiculturalism. What used to be simply a call for tolerance of each other's beliefs is now a silent killer. Rather than physically executing a Christian for confessing the truth, we now have a politically correct apparatus through multiculturalism in which to "kill" the message that there can be only one truth found in Christ. Claiming to have "the Truth" is a message held by hyper-radicals like Islamofascist terrorist groups, by today's "standards." "Live and let live" is the message of the day and sadly too many American Christians are buying into it. Don't believe me? Just do a web search on "interfaith community" and you will get over 6 million results. It is extremely popular today for religious leaders of all faiths to publicly join hands together in "working for a better world." The "social gospel" transcends all "faith traditions." The following is highly unpopular with the priests and priestesses of the multicultural religion of today,
![]() |
| Interfaith service in Pomfret, CT |
"14 Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? 15 What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said,
“ I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17 Therefore go out from their midst, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing; then I will welcome you, 18 and I will be a father to you, and you shall be sons and daughters to me, says the Lord Almighty.” —1 Corinthians 6:14-18
My prayers go out to Pr. Youcef Nadarkhani and his family. I don't want to romanticize his predicament and neither do I want to belittle it with some sort of comparison to what we Christians in America are facing. However, I think there is much to be said about being able to see your enemy's face and with the strength of God confess the truth of Christ Jesus. All too often, here in America, we don't get to see the "face" of the enemy until it is too late and the evil work of the devil has been thoroughly accomplished in our midst.




I think that religious tolerance and freedom of religion is a good idea. I think that it's possible to allow others, including non-Christians, to practice their faiths and worldviews alongside ours, yet at the same time maintaining the orthodoxy of the Lutheran faith. I think that tolerance isn't the same as acceptance. Just because I think it's okay for Muslims/Hindu people/Jewish people/atheists/etc to express their viewpoints equally in the secular realm, that doesn't mean that I necessarily condone what they believe in. If we Lutheran Christians expect to be allowed to worship freely and without persecution or marginalization, then we need to give as good as we get, so to speak. Do you think this is a consistent and non-contradictory belief?
ReplyDeleteShould there be a compromise within the secular/civil realm between "you're only allowed to practice and believe in one religion, no exceptions" as is the case with the Islamofacist theocracy in Iran, and "all religions are equally as right and there is no objective truth and every viewpoint should be considered irregardless of intrinsic worth", which seems to be the case with contemporary secular culture within the US? Do you think the doctrines within the Lutheran Confessions are consistent with the extent of religious tolerance and freedom to worship that are found in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the other writings of the founding fathers?
Ariel,
ReplyDeleteFreedom of religion is a good idea and of course I am not arguing against it in my article. I also point out in my article that what once was tolerance for other's religions has now turned into interfaith ecumenism where each religion is treated as equals in truth. This issue goes beyond tolerance or simple respect for each other, but about accepting that another person has what is "truth for them" when it comes to religion. As a Lutheran you can NOT consistently confess Christ and also say that a Muslim has a true faith, even "just for them."
At any rate, I hope that helps to clear up some confusion and thank you for reading my article and blog.
Blessings,
Jim Pierce
Jim,
ReplyDeleteI once met an Orthodox priest from Serbia during the conflict in the 90s and I commented that it must be difficult to be a Christian. He stated that at least they know what they are up against and he said they pray for us daily because we have no idea of what we are up against.
Andrew,
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing that story and that priest is so right.